The recent assassination of U.S. political commentator Charlie Kirk has ignited a
global discourse on the precarious state of democracy, the increasing polarisation of
political landscapes, and the alarming trend of silencing dissenting voices. While this
tragic event unfolded thousands of miles away, its implications resonate profoundly
in South Africa, a nation grappling with rampant political violence and the targeting of
activists.
What happens when young voices are silenced, not by choice but by fear? When
does advocacy become a high-risk endeavour? For a country that relies on its youth
to drive democratic renewal, these are not abstract questions; they are urgent calls
to action.
Political Violence: A Global Lens, Local Realities
Globally, political violence is on the rise. According to the International Institute for
Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA, 2021), political assassinations and
targeted attacks against activists and dissenters are contributing to declining trust in
democratic institutions worldwide. Charlie Kirk’s death starkly reminds us that
activism, even in seemingly safe spaces, is vulnerable to violent disruption.
In South Africa, political violence is a persistent challenge. Sources from the Global
Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime (GI-TOC) and Corruption
Watch indicate a significant number of politically motivated assassinations and a
worsening trend, with one report from May 2024 detailing over 141 assassinations in
2022 alone. Young leaders, community activists, and whistleblowers often face
threats, harassment, and, in some cases, death.
Consider the case of Sindiso Magaqa, a rising youth leader in KwaZulu-Natal. In
2017, Magaqa was ambushed and fatally shot while opposing corruption within the
ANC Youth League. His death sent shockwaves through local communities,
illustrating the perils that accompany youth leadership and political accountability.
(NPA, 2025).
Similarly, Nokuthula Mabaso, a prominent leader in the eKhenana Commune
associated with Abahlali baseMjondolo, was assassinated in 2022 after advocating
for land rights and choosing to testify against perpetrators of local injustices. These
incidents expose a pattern: young, courageous voices are targeted, often with
impunity.
Not all silencing is violent. Sometimes, it’s quieter, more insidious. Take Nhlanhla
“Lux” Dlamini, once a household name. In 2021 and 2022, he commanded national
attention as the leader of Operation Dudula, positioning himself as a voice for
communities frustrated with crime, drugs, and unemployment. He represented the raw energy of South Africa’s youth, fearless, visible, unafraid to take on government
structures and even foreign nationals in controversial ways.
However, where is Nhlanhla Lux today? His voice has all but disappeared from
public discourse. What does it mean when once-vocal youth leaders suddenly retreat
into silence? Is it a sign of burnout? Disillusionment with politics? Or could it be the
inevitable outcome of a system that punishes and intimidates those who speak too
loudly?
For many young people watching from the sidelines, the disappearance of such
figures raises uncomfortable questions: If even those who were once bold enough to
challenge the system go quiet, what hope is there for the rest of us?
Silencing Youth: Threats Beyond Assassination
Political assassination is the most extreme form of silencing, but subtler tactics are
widespread. South African youth activists frequently face intimidation, surveillance,
smear campaigns, and online harassment.
Even non-political youth changemakers are not immune. According to UNICEF U-
Report South Africa, 73% of youth reported needing mental health support in 2022,
yet only 38% sought help. (UNICEF, 2022) Could fear of retaliation for speaking out
or advocating change contribute to these mental health gaps? Absolutely. How can a
democracy thrive when the voices most likely to innovate and challenge injustice are
systematically suppressed?
Youth Leadership as a Cornerstone of Democracy
South Africa’s youth, defined by Statistics South Africa (Stats SA) as individuals
aged 15 to 34 years, constitute a significant portion of the population. According to
Stats SA’s 2024 mid-year estimates, this cohort makes up approximately 33.1% of
the country’s total population and is a critical demographic for democratic renewal.
Yet they remain largely excluded from formal decision-making structures. When
youth leaders are silenced, entire communities lose representation, accountability
falters, and systemic inequities persist.
Programmes like Activate! Change Drivers play a pivotal role in bridging the gap
between youth potential and democratic participation. Through its workshops on civic
engagement, participatory democracy, and advocacy skills, Activate! equips young
people with the tools to step confidently into governance spaces while fostering
resilience against the threats they face. Beyond training, the network creates
tangible platforms for action, ensuring that young leaders are not only inspired but
also protected and supported in their advocacy.
Initiatives such as the Gen G Engage App, which enables youth to monitor and
report Gender-Based Violence and Femicide (GBVF) cases, strengthen both transparency and civic accountability. Campaigns like #WearYourSupport challenge harmful norms around masculinity and vulnerability, offering young men avenues to engage in advocacy while prioritising mental health. Meanwhile, community workshops bring youth into dialogue with municipal authorities, building capacity for youth-led oversight and accountability. These initiatives underscore a critical truth: youth leadership thrives not only when opportunities exist, but when safety, structural support, and empowerment go hand in hand.
The Global-Local Imperative: Lessons for South Africa
Charlie Kirk’s assassination forces reflection: What mechanisms exist to protect
young leaders everywhere? Are they sufficient? In South Africa, current measures
are inconsistent, enforcement is weak, and risks persist. This raises questions that
demand urgent attention:
How do we shield youth activists from intimidation, harassment, and worse,
without stifling democratic debate?
What role should civil society play in safeguarding changemakers, especially
those confronting entrenched power structures?
How can mental health interventions be integrated into youth leadership
programmes to prevent burnout and trauma?
The answers lie in robust legal frameworks, community-based protection strategies,
and continued investment in youth-led advocacy. Activate!’s programmes offer a
model, illustrating structured support.
Protecting Voices, Sustaining Democracy
South African youth cannot afford silence. The stories of Sindiso Magaqa, Nokuthula
Mabaso, and countless others are sobering reminders that activism carries risk, but
democracy falters when voices are muffled. We can’t allow young people to be
silenced without consequence. If we fail to protect them, what kind of democracy are
we leaving for the next generation?
Youth voices must be protected, amplified, and supported. Civic education,
participatory governance, and mental health resources are not optional; they are the
lifeblood of a thriving democracy. Organisations like Activate! demonstrate that
change is possible. Through mentorship, campaigns, and grassroots mobilisation,
they cultivate resilient leaders who can navigate threats while pushing for justice and
accountability.
Conclusion: From Tragedy to Action
Charlie Kirk’s death, while occurring overseas, resonates as a global cautionary tale.
In South Africa, youth activists face tangible threats to their lives. The challenge is
not only to mourn those lost, but to mobilise protective systems, strengthen civic
participation, and safeguard democracy.
The question remains: Will we rise to protect our young changemakers, or will we
allow fear to silence them? Only then can we build a democracy where youth
leadership is celebrated, supported, and, most importantly, safe.